Čiurnos sąnario mobilizacijos poveikis judesių amplitudei bei eisenos parametrams, asmenims po blauzdos kaulų lūžių

Tarvydas, Ignas

Dspace pagrindinis
→
Studentų baigiamieji darbai - Studijų programos
→
kineziterapija
→
Peržiūrėti elementą

Čiurnos sąnario mobilizacijos poveikis judesių amplitudei bei eisenos parametrams, asmenims po blauzdos kaulų lūžių

Tarvydas, Ignas

URI: http://dspace.kaunokolegija.lt//handle/123456789/532

Data: 2018-06

Santrauka:

Darbe siekiama nustatyti čiurnos mobilizacijos poveikį čiurnos, lenkimui bei tiesimui, taip pat eisenos parametrams ilgiui ir pločiui, asmenims patyrusiems distalinius blauzdos kaulų lūžius, ir gydytus neoperaciniu būdu, naudojant gipso įtvarą.

Description:

Relevance : As M. Landrum and others. (2011) say after prolonged ankle joint imobilization, it is often that ankle dorsiflexion range of motion degrades. After posterior and anterior ankle joint mobilization, ankle dorsiflexion is increased and the tension after imobilization is releaved (M. Landrum and others. 2011). R. Silva and others. (2017) states that ankle joint is the most often injured joint among sportsman. Such as ankle sprain, fractures, luxations, contusions, ruptures of tendons and ligaments, all of these injuries implement pain and reduced functual, phyzical lower extremity capacity. During subacute and acute injury time the appearence of connective tissue reduces joint range of motion (R. Silva and others. 2017). Research purpose: Evaluate ankle mobilization effect on ankle joint range of motion and gait parameters in patiens with shin bone fracture. Research objectives: 1. Evaluate ankle mobilization effect on ankle joint range of motion in patiens with shin bone fracture, before, within and after the application of mobilization. 2. Evaluate ankle mobilization effect on gait parameters in patiens with whin bone fracture, before, within and after the application of mobilization. 3. Compare ankle joint range of motion and gait parameters changes within the research. Subjects: 11 individuals, who has experienced a shin bone fracture, 7 of them had fractured fibula and 4 of them tibia. Subjects of the research didn‘t have any adjecent ilnesses which could implement the results of the research. All subject have experienced the fractures of lower extremity for the first time and were treated by nonoperative means. All participants limps were imobilized in the distal parts of the body including ankle. Research methods: During the research ankle range of motion and gait parameters will be evalueted before, within (after 3 applications of mobilization) and after all applications of ankle joint mobilization. Also there are 5 mobilization methods included 2 which induce dorsiflexion, 2 inducing plantarflexion and 1 which affects both. Every participant will get 6 applications of ankle joint mobilization 2 minutes of each method which concludes in 10 minutes total. Research tools: Goniometer, meter. Impact: Physiotherapy and ankle joint mobilization. Rezults: After completing the measurements it has shown, that ankle mobilization for patients after distal part of a shin bone fractures and healing by conventional methods, does a positive effect. Conclusions 1. Plantarflexion and dorsiflexion range of motion have increased in patients after shin bone fractures, during the mobilization. 2. Patients after shin bone fracture have increased their length of the step, during the mobilization, however the width did not. 3. Ankle joint mobilization for patients after shin bone fracture increases plantar and dorsal flexion, also the length of the step, but does not have an impact on the width of the step.

Rodyti visą įrašą